Ursula Le Guin
The Earthsea Quartet:
A Wizard of Earthsea I.
The Tombs of Atuan II.
The Farthest Shore III.
Tehanu IV.
1968/1971/1972/1990
Ursula
Le Guin is a writer, first of all; in this series, the fantasy feels
like occupational hazard. There's magic but it is so integrantly part of
the tale that you don't have to buy it; there are dragons but their
effect is told rather than shown; there is a king but he's as
straightforward as they come. Every aspect of fantasy lore is subdued,
painted into the background image, the ambiance of the books. This
allows Le Guin to tell her real story, that is, to bring the everyday
out of fantasy and the fantasy into the everyday. Don't expect to get
close to the characters; it's not so much about them and what happens to
them, as it is about how what happens to them can tell us about what
happens to us. You find instances of everyday situations that no one has
a name for, yet that feel so familiar, looked into with an uncanny eye.
You find philosophy, social theory, ethics, and honest wisdom all
woven together as part of the tapestry of Earthsea.
With a shrewd
perception of the human mind, Le Guin weaves a moral tale like the
tales of old, but leaves you slightly fantasy-hungry.
Tags: magic, dragons, feminist thought, philo & wisdom, ship & sea, héros malmené, race
AUTEURS' LIBRARY
Austen Jane
(1)
Barrie J. M.
(1)
Bowen Elizabeth
(1)
Cooper James Fenimore
(2)
Cronin A.J.
(2)
Dostoyevsky Fyodor
(1)
Ee Susan
(2)
Farland David
(1)
Fitzgerald F. Scott
(1)
Flewelling Lynn
(1)
Forster E. M.
(2)
Gaskell Elizabeth
(1)
Golding William
(1)
Grahame Kenneth
(1)
Harpman Jacqueline
(3)
Hobb Robin
(5)
Ishiguro Kazuo
(1)
Le Guin Ursula K.
(2)
London Jack
(1)
Martin George R. R.
(3)
Melville Herman
(1)
Murail Marie-Aude
(1)
Ngῦgῖ wa Thiong’o
(1)
Pilcher Rosamunde
(1)
Ryan Anthony
(2)
Salinger J. D.
(1)
Shaw George Bernard
(2)
Stegner Wallace
(2)
Steinbeck John
(1)
Stevenson Robert Louis
(2)
Tarkington Booth
(1)
Vaughan Brian K.
(1)
Webb Mary
(2)
Wharton Edith
(1)
Monday, 23 November 2015
Sunday, 22 November 2015
Auteur's library
Robert
Louis Stevenson
Strange
Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
1886
While we all know the expression “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde”,
we don’t necessarily know the book to actually be good. This short narration delivers,
effortlessly capturing the reader’s attention in its very first few lines. Tension is well suffused; you want to
know, it gets you so close to the narrative, confined within this misty
nighttime London and its back alleys lined with sombre doors…and leaves you on
the borders, never really plunging in those foggy London Streets, never really
fearing as the characters fear. You’re told what occurs, the suspense lingers,
but the story is not lived for it’s first and foremost a narration. For a book
on evil you see very little manifestation of it and, though the attraction and
freedom of a split nature is well-developed, it’s fair to say it could
have gone further, dared more in exploring Hyde’s evilness and Jekyll’s falling over the
edge. Utterson is your guide and, being kept pure till the very end, his
meeting with evil will be something of an anti-climax. Whispering at so many close doors, this captivating read only brushes when you
want to dig in.
Tags: 19th-century backstreet London, gothic science fiction or nighttime London thriller, and man made Hyde and Hyde destroyed man, story of the parasite within and the parasite without or the unleashing of the id, from science to schizo to magic, limits of man, science vs. nature or the theory of chaos
Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde- ""Well, life has been pleasant; I liked it""
""Well, life has been pleasant; I liked it; yes, sir, I used to like it. I sometimes think if we new all, we should be more glad to get away."" (31)
"I have been made to learn that the doom and burden of our life is bound forever on man's shoulders, and when the attempt is made to cast it off, it but returns upon us with more unfamiliar and more awful pressure." (59)
"I have been made to learn that the doom and burden of our life is bound forever on man's shoulders, and when the attempt is made to cast it off, it but returns upon us with more unfamiliar and more awful pressure." (59)
Saturday, 21 November 2015
Auteur's library
Kazuo Ishiguro
The Remains of the Day
1989
The Remains of the Day
1989
In order to
do it justice, The Remains of the Day ought
to be judged on two different grounds: as
the work of an author and as fiction. My opinions on both vary widely.
The first turned out to be very positive and it is in fact Kazuo Ishiguro’s talent which renders the fiction actually deceptive and, eventually, a deception. Way before the end, I found myself liking the book, yet disliking its story. Be sure of this: nothing happens for the story centers chiefly on the butler Stevens as he recalls life at Darlington Hall during the 30s. Nostalgia, melancholy and bittersweet memories, a lot of denial, too, will make this flawless study essentially a ‘feeling’ book. With a great sense of structure, Ishiguro makes memories seem as if they sprang up spontaneously from Stevens’ own memory, when this recalling is actually organized along a shrewd line. But it is through a thoroughly mastered and precise use of language that Ishiguro best delivers his character, without ever betraying him with his own authoritative voice. You really are left in Stevens’ thoughts to judge for yourself. Beware spoilers!
As past events unveil and Stevens’ thoughts unravel, the horror surfaces from behind the façade of good old English sentiments. Little by little you come to understand that this is a systematic tale of a failed human mind and heart, best summarized by a critique addressed to Stevens: ““You just let all this go on before you and you never think to look at it for what it is.”” (234)
Indeed, Stevens is so obsessed with the little matters of his life that he avoids any personal and moral engagement when important ones come his way. This is what his great moments are made of: random and often absurd trivia. He talks a great deal about righteousness and dignity, yet fails to show any when most needed (his father’s illness, the Jewish maids, relationship with Nazi Germany,…) and it seems he busies himself so as to avoid growing up and confronting the tasks ahead of him as an independent human rather than as a submissive butler. This is a rather amoral man who lives in demanding times and refuses to meet them. Does he believe in anything beyond the excellent quality of silver polish?
He has managed to become quite the spitting image of his dear Lord Darlington, himself a coward devoid of values of his own who sheepishly follows any conduct of his friends_ wasn’t this one of Stevens’ chief ambitions: reflect in his own way the “great men” of his time…? Well, Lord Darlington is one ugly character and Stevens becomes another for refusing during 99% percent of the book to see it_ for admitting that much would put into question the importance he gives to his own life.
With his obsession of wanting everything just so, he remains nice without ever being kind. He is too concerned with his best course of action to show empathy and sympathy and eventually remains clueless. His recalling is hardly composed of the mature thoughts of an old man but is rather that of a teenager who’s skin deep in character and refuses to shake it off when the moment most requires it. Having constantly changed his views so as to feel more comfortable with his increasingly haunting reminiscences, epiphany comes in late and the real question is: will he keep it going and face the ‘new’ world without repeating old wrongs?
The Remains of the Day felt like a writing masterpiece which credibly delivered a difficult story to read through without banging the book against the wall. I will always dislike Stevens, but now I really love Ishiguro.
The first turned out to be very positive and it is in fact Kazuo Ishiguro’s talent which renders the fiction actually deceptive and, eventually, a deception. Way before the end, I found myself liking the book, yet disliking its story. Be sure of this: nothing happens for the story centers chiefly on the butler Stevens as he recalls life at Darlington Hall during the 30s. Nostalgia, melancholy and bittersweet memories, a lot of denial, too, will make this flawless study essentially a ‘feeling’ book. With a great sense of structure, Ishiguro makes memories seem as if they sprang up spontaneously from Stevens’ own memory, when this recalling is actually organized along a shrewd line. But it is through a thoroughly mastered and precise use of language that Ishiguro best delivers his character, without ever betraying him with his own authoritative voice. You really are left in Stevens’ thoughts to judge for yourself. Beware spoilers!
As past events unveil and Stevens’ thoughts unravel, the horror surfaces from behind the façade of good old English sentiments. Little by little you come to understand that this is a systematic tale of a failed human mind and heart, best summarized by a critique addressed to Stevens: ““You just let all this go on before you and you never think to look at it for what it is.”” (234)
Indeed, Stevens is so obsessed with the little matters of his life that he avoids any personal and moral engagement when important ones come his way. This is what his great moments are made of: random and often absurd trivia. He talks a great deal about righteousness and dignity, yet fails to show any when most needed (his father’s illness, the Jewish maids, relationship with Nazi Germany,…) and it seems he busies himself so as to avoid growing up and confronting the tasks ahead of him as an independent human rather than as a submissive butler. This is a rather amoral man who lives in demanding times and refuses to meet them. Does he believe in anything beyond the excellent quality of silver polish?
He has managed to become quite the spitting image of his dear Lord Darlington, himself a coward devoid of values of his own who sheepishly follows any conduct of his friends_ wasn’t this one of Stevens’ chief ambitions: reflect in his own way the “great men” of his time…? Well, Lord Darlington is one ugly character and Stevens becomes another for refusing during 99% percent of the book to see it_ for admitting that much would put into question the importance he gives to his own life.
With his obsession of wanting everything just so, he remains nice without ever being kind. He is too concerned with his best course of action to show empathy and sympathy and eventually remains clueless. His recalling is hardly composed of the mature thoughts of an old man but is rather that of a teenager who’s skin deep in character and refuses to shake it off when the moment most requires it. Having constantly changed his views so as to feel more comfortable with his increasingly haunting reminiscences, epiphany comes in late and the real question is: will he keep it going and face the ‘new’ world without repeating old wrongs?
The Remains of the Day felt like a writing masterpiece which credibly delivered a difficult story to read through without banging the book against the wall. I will always dislike Stevens, but now I really love Ishiguro.
Tags: cross-country tour, Darlington Hall as the only scene of life worthy of Stevens' opinion, pre-Second World War era, generational change and old English estates, political tensions in Europe in the interwar period, butlers and lords, dealing with antisemitism, shrewd analysis of the human mind, the complex do's and don'ts of class hierarchy in old English aristocratic society, total denial of the importance of the "what the hell are we doing here?" question for the sake of niceness, 'servants'' courtship dance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)